There is a workshop in the Jordaan district of Amsterdam where a craftsman named Pieter Kolk makes tables. He makes roughly twelve a year. Each one takes him between three and six weeks. He uses oak he sources from a single forest in Gelderland, dried for a minimum of four years before it enters his studio. The waiting list is currently two years long.
Kolk is not unusual in his method — he is unusual in that his method is now aspirational. Across northern Europe and beyond, a cluster of studios has quietly concluded that the defining gesture of serious design in the 2020s is not novelty but restraint. Not innovation but duration. Not disruption but the slow, unspectacular work of making something that will outlast its maker.
“I am not anti-technology,” Kolk tells me, running a hand along a panel of quarter-sawn oak still rough from the bandsaw. “I use CNC for certain operations. But the decision about when to use it and when not to is entirely mine. The machine serves the material. The material serves the person who will sit at the table. That is the whole chain. That is everything.”
The movement — if it can be called that — has no manifesto and no name its participants use among themselves. Critics have called it variously ‘slow design,’ ‘material honesty,’ and ‘neo-craft.’ The studios themselves prefer silence on the matter of labels. What they share is a set of commitments: to sourcing, to joinery, to finish, to the object’s life after they have released it into the world.
In London, the studio Commonplace — founded in 2019 by former Barber & Osgerby designers Roshani Mehta and Jack Tillman — makes lighting and seating from materials they source, process, and finish entirely in-house. Their ‘Wick’ pendant, a dome of blown borosilicate glass with an oxidised bronze fitting, takes fourteen weeks to produce one unit. They make forty a year. A single lamp costs £2,800. They have a three-year backlog.
“We genuinely did not expect this,” Mehta says. “We expected to be small and beloved and slightly broke. Instead we are small and beloved and extremely busy.” She pauses. “Which is a problem we are trying not to solve by becoming something else.”
The problem of scaling without betraying the thing that made you worth scaling is, of course, not new to craft. But something feels different in the current moment. The studios operating in this register are not simply reacting against mass production — they are reacting against a specific kind of mass production: the kind that learned to look like craft. The DTC furniture company that photographs its products in linen-curtained studios. The fast-fashion brand that releases a ‘considered’ collection. The tech giant that hires a legendary industrial designer and then overrides every decision that adds a day to the manufacturing timeline.
“The mimicry got very good,” says design historian Anika Sørensen, whose 2024 book ‘The Honest Object’ traced the genealogy of material thinking from Arts & Crafts to the present. “And when mimicry gets good enough, the only response left is to be so specific about your process that mimicry becomes economically impossible. You make the gap visible again.”
Making the gap visible is precisely what these studios are doing — not through marketing but through documentation. Kolk publishes a quarterly newsletter that is essentially a production diary: photographs of the drying shed, notes on a batch of ash that arrived with unexpected figure, reflections on a joinery decision that took him three weeks to resolve. It has 11,000 subscribers. He has never advertised.
Leave a Reply